|
|
Volume
6: No. 4, October 2009
LETTER
Risk Perceptions and Behavior Among Hospitalized Patients With Smoking-Related Diseases
Suggested citation for this article: Tanni SE, Iritsu NI, Tani M,
de Camargo PAB, Sampaio MGE, Godoy I, et al. Risk perceptions and behavior among hospitalized patients with smoking-related diseases [letter]. Prev Chronic Dis 2009;6(4):A138.
http://www.cy118119.com/pcd/issues/2009/
oct/09_0040.htm. Accessed
[date].
PEER REVIEWED
To the Editor:
Evidence in favor of implementing smoking cessation measures is strong, and such measures are critical for improving health outcomes among smokers and others who are exposed to
secondhand smoke
(1,2). Although some studies have evaluated the perception of the association between tobacco use and tobacco-related diseases
(3), they have not, to our knowledge, investigated risk perceptions among patients
who are hospitalized with smoking-related diseases. We surveyed a sample of such patients to evaluate their
perceived risk and the potential for cessation interventions in this population.
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 348 people who were smokers or former smokers and who were admitted to the University Hospital of Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil, with tobacco-related diseases, from August 2007
through January 2008. We defined “tobacco-related disease” according to Brazilian Thoracic Society and World Health Organization guidelines, as follows: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, cerebral stroke, ischemic heart disease,
venous thromboembolism, gastritis, gastric or duodenal ulcer, premature labor, and cancer (lung, oral, larynges, esophagus, gastric, pancreas, colon/rectal, bladder, kidney, breast, and uterus)
(1,4). Exclusion criteria were patients
who were in unstable condition (undergoing mechanical or noninvasive ventilation, with an unstable hemodynamic condition, or with alterations in mental status) or
who were unable to answer or understand the survey questions. Participants gave written informed consent,
and the hospital research ethics committee approved the study. We collected data on patient characteristics, knowledge about smoking-related diseases, smoking history, and smoking cessation treatment prescribed by health care professionals.
Most patients with smoking-related diseases were male (69%) and had fewer than 4 years of formal education (70%). The leading causes of hospitalization were cardiovascular disease (48%), cancer (20%), and respiratory diseases (12%). A substantial number of respondents (41%) were current smokers
at the time of the hospitalization. This prevalence of smoking is much higher than that observed for the adult Brazilian population (10%-21%)
(5). Exposure to
secondhand smoke at home or work was reported by 85% of respondents. Patients reported that they had initiated smoking at a young age (mean 15 y), and 53% of the current smokers showed moderate-to-high nicotine dependence, according to the Fagerström score (6); 67% of the current smokers reported smoking the first cigarette within 30 minutes of waking up.
A high percentage of patients (65%) with smoking-related disease said they did not know about the association between smoking and their disease. However, 92% of respondents said they had been questioned by a health professional about their smoking status. More than 80% of respondents reported that they had received only brief counseling to stop smoking during the course of their disease, including the present hospitalization, and only 7% of the respondents had received specific smoking
cessation treatment with counseling and medication.
Our findings suggest that hospitalization could be the ideal time to introduce guideline-based smoking cessation interventions including behavior counseling and pharmacologic treatment. These moments are windows of opportunity to improve patients’ understanding of the relationship between smoking and their disease and to help them find smoking cessation treatment and follow-up after hospital discharge
(7). Most patients (72%) were aware of smoking cessation methods, including those not
recommended by the most recent guidelines, such as aversive technique or hypnosis (2,4). However, only 31% of patients reported knowing about the existence of specialized services for smoking cessation.
Limitations of our study include not taking into consideration the perspective of health care professionals and not identifying factors that
may predict differences in risk perception and behavior between patients. We also did not investigate patients’ reasons for not quitting when advised to do so. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that the patients did not remember or did not comply with physician counseling or prescriptions.
Our findings of poor knowledge about the relationship between smoking and disease and the low rate of smoking cessation treatment reflect international problems (3,7). Training health professionals to adhere to guidelines by counseling their smoking patients more comprehensively, and implementing smoking cessation treatment among smoking patients who are hospitalized with smoking-related diseases, are effective tools to improve their health outcomes. Although costly, treatments for improving smokers’ health outcomes are effective and they have been adopted,
but the less expensive approach of smoking cessation treatment has been neglected.
Suzana E. Tanni, PhD
Nathalie Izumi Iritsu
Massaki Tani
Paula Angeleli Bueno de Camargo
Marina Gonçalves Elias Sampaio
Ilda Godoy, PhD
Irma Godoy, PhD
Botucatu Medical School
São Paulo State University
S鉶 Paulo, Brazil
Back to top
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by research grants 07/53266-7 and 07/51595-3 from FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa
do Estado de S鉶 Paulo, S鉶 Paulo, Brazil).
Back to top
References
- Report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008 — the MPOWER package. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization; 2008.
http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/en. Accessed May 28, 2009.
- Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, Bailey WC, Benowitz NL, Curry SJ, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical practice guideline. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
- Houfek JF, Atwood JR, Wolfe RM, Agrawal S, Reiser GM, Schaefer GB, et al.
Knowledge and beliefs about genetics and smoking among visitors and staff at a health care facility. Public Health Nurs 2008;25(1):77-87.
- Reichert J, deAraújo AJ, Gonçalves CMC, Godoy I, Chatkin JM, Sales MPU, et al.
Smoking cessation guidelines — 2008. J Bras Pneumol 2008;34(10):845-80.
- Protection and risk factors for chronic diseases by telephone inquiry. Brazilia (DF): Vigitel Brazil; 2008. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_2008.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2009.
- Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO.
The Fagerström Test for
Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;86(9):1119-27.
- Bock BC, Becker B, Niaura R, Partridge R.
Smoking among emergency chest pain patients: motivation to quit, risk perception and physician intervention. Nicotine Tob Res 2000;2(1):93-6.
Back to top
|
|
