Key points

Affiliates
Danielle Boyce [1][2], Jaime Raymond [3], Theodore C. Larson [3], Eddie Kirkland [4], D. Kevin Horton [3], Paul Mehta [3]
- Center for Quantitative Methods and Data Science, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Johns Hopkins University Schools of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Office of Innovation and Analytics, National ALS Registry (CDC/ATSDR), Atlanta, GA, USA
Summary
This study from the Center for Quantitative Methods and Data Science, and the National ALS Registry, aims to understand the role artificial intelligence (AI) can play in reinforcing data analysis of the perception of the cause of ALS held by individuals living with the disease. The team used over 3000 narrative responses who answered the question “What do you think caused your ALS?” when joining the National ALS Registry and applied both qualitative methods and natural language processing (NLP) AI methods, specifically Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), to assess the responses. The study found that traditional qualitative analysis methods resulted in a more comprehensive theme and subtheme development of the responses, but AI can provide a reinforcing check for traditional analysis methods. The team proposes the union of human and AI analysis methods in future studies of qualitative data in order to approach the data from all angles.
This page was last updated on this date. Updates may include minor edits, image changes, or other modifications to page content.
The information on this page was last reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy.