Volume 10 — June 06, 2013
BRIEF
No Financial Disincentive for Choosing More Healthful Entrées on Children’s Menus in Full-Service Restaurants
This flowchart begins with the 200 top-grossing restaurant chains in the Restaurants & Institutions 2009 list. Next, 110 restaurant chains were not identified as full-service according to the North American Industry Classification System and excluded; 90 restaurant chains identified as full-service by the North American Industry Classification System were included. Next, the 15 restaurant chains were excluded: 6 because they were not identified as full-service according to the Children’s Menu Assessment (2 were buffet, and 4 were “fast-casual”); 1 because it was closed; and 8 because they did not have a children’s menu. Seventy-five full-service restaurant chains had a children’s menu. Seventeen restaurant chains were then excluded because their children’s menu did not have at least 1 more healthful option. The final analytic sample included 58 restaurant chains that had at least 1 more healthful option on the children’s menu.
Figure. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for study on children’s menus. Abbreviations: NAICS, North American Industry Classification System; CMA, Children’s Menu Assessment.
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions.
