• <samp id="ossg8"></samp>
    <tbody id="ossg8"><nobr id="ossg8"></nobr></tbody>
    <menuitem id="ossg8"><strong id="ossg8"></strong></menuitem>
  • <samp id="ossg8"></samp>
    <menuitem id="ossg8"><strong id="ossg8"></strong></menuitem>
  • <menuitem id="ossg8"><ins id="ossg8"></ins></menuitem>

  • <tbody id="ossg8"><nobr id="ossg8"></nobr></tbody>
    <menuitem id="ossg8"></menuitem>
        Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to site content
        CDC Home

        Sodium Intake Among U.S. Adults — 26 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2013

        Jing Fang, MD1; Mary E. Cogswell, DrPH1; Soyoun Park, PhD1; Sandra L. Jackson, PhD1; Erika C. Odom, PhD1 (Author affiliations at end of text)

        Excess sodium intake is a major risk factor for hypertension, and subsequently, heart disease and stroke, the first and fifth leading causes of U.S. deaths, respectively (1). During 2011–2012, the average daily sodium intake among U.S. adults was estimated to be 3,592 mg (2), above the Healthy People 2020 target of 2,300 mg (3). To support strategies to reduce dietary sodium intake, 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from states and territories that implemented the new sodium-related behavior module were assessed. Across 26 states, the District of Columbia (DC), and Puerto Rico, 39%–73% of adults reported taking action (i.e., watching or reducing sodium intake) (median = 51%), and 14%–41% reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake (median = 22%). Compared with adults without hypertension, a higher percentage of adults with self-reported hypertension reported taking action and receiving advice to reduce sodium intake. For states that implemented the module, these results can serve as a baseline to monitor the effects of programs designed to reduce sodium intake.

        BRFSS is an annual, random-digit–dialed telephone survey representative of noninstitutionalized, civilian adults aged ≥18 years in each U.S. state and territory. Detailed information on the survey is available at http://www.cy118119.com/brfss. In 2013, 26 states, DC, and Puerto Rico implemented the new, optional sodium-related behavior module. The median American Association of Public Opinion Research location-specific response rate was 48.1% (range = 31.1%–60.3%) (4).

        Taking action to reduce sodium intake was defined by a "yes" response to the question, "Are you currently watching or reducing your sodium or salt intake?" Receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake was defined by a "yes" response to the question, "Has a doctor or other health professional ever advised you to reduce sodium or salt intake?" Self-reported hypertension was defined by a "yes" response to the question, "Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you have high blood pressure?" The percentage of respondents taking action or receiving advice to reduce sodium intake was estimated for each state overall and by self-reported hypertension status. All estimates were age-standardized using the 2000 U.S. standard projected population. States were categorized in quartiles based on age-standardized proportions of respondents reporting taking action to reduce sodium intake and on proportions reporting having received advice to reduce sodium intake.

        A total of 185,463 participants answered questions from the optional sodium module. After excluding 5,396 participants with missing information on key variables, 180,067 participants were included. State sample sizes ranged from 3,332 (Massachusetts) to 12,363 (Minnesota). The proportion of respondents who reported taking action to reduce sodium intake ranged from 38.7% (Utah) to 73.4% (Puerto Rico), with a median of 50.6% (Table 1). Across all participating locations, a higher proportion of participants with hypertension reported taking action to reduce sodium intake compared with those without hypertension (p<0.001 for all comparisons) (Table 1).

        The proportion of participants who reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake ranged from 13.5% (Minnesota) to 41.4% (Puerto Rico), with a median of 21.1%. Across all locations, a higher proportion of participants with hypertension reported receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake compared with those without hypertension (p<0.001 for all comparisons) (Table 2).

        Although only 10 of the 28 survey areas were in the Southern U.S. Census Region,* most of the survey areas with the highest proportions of respondents reporting taking action to reduce sodium intake and most of those with the highest proportion of respondents reporting having received advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake were in the South. Eight of 10 states in the South were in the top two quartiles for taking action; the two that were not in the top two quartiles were West Virginia and Kentucky (Figure 1). All 10 states in the South were in the top two quartiles for receiving advice. The other four survey areas in the top half were Connecticut, New Jersey, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico (Figure 2).

        Discussion

        In 2013, across 26 states, DC, and Puerto Rico, the proportion of respondents who reported both taking action and receiving advice to reduce sodium intake varied, with generally higher proportions in states in the Southern U.S. Census Region, Missouri, some states in the Northeastern U.S. Census Region, and Puerto Rico. Overall, approximately half of U.S. adults in participating states and territories reported taking action to reduce sodium intake, and about one in five reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake. Respondents with self-reported hypertension were more likely to take action and receive advice to reduce sodium intake than those without. However, among adults with self-reported hypertension, 20% (Puerto Rico) to 50% (Utah) did not report taking action to reduce sodium intake. In all but four locations (DC, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Puerto Rico), less than half of respondents reported receiving advice to reduce sodium intake. Among adults without hypertension, most did not report taking action to reduce sodium intake, and an even smaller proportion reported receiving professional advice to reduced sodium. These findings suggest an opportunity for promoting strategies to reduce sodium consumption among all adults, with and without hypertension.

        This is the first report with state-level estimates of sodium intake behavior among the general population. The geographic pattern of the prevalence of taking action or receiving advice to reduce sodium intake appears to roughly correspond with the pattern of the prevalence of self-reported hypertension (5). BRFSS 2009 data indicate the prevalence of self-reported hypertension is generally higher in the Southern U.S. Census Region, plus Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. A possible explanation for the higher prevalence of taking action and receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake in Connecticut and New Jersey could be proximity to New York City's (NYC) media campaign promoting sodium reduction and other NYC and state programs aimed at reducing sodium intake. For example, in April 2013, NYC launched a communication campaign for consumers to purchase lower-sodium foods.

        The finding that Puerto Rico had the highest percentage of respondents both taking action and receiving advice for sodium reduction is new. The high percentages might be related to high hypertension prevalence. Based on 2013 BRFSS data, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension in Puerto Rico was 42.3%, whereas the national prevalence was 31.4% (6).

        The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, BRFSS data are self-reported and subject to recall and social desirability bias, which might overestimate or underestimate prevalence. Second, the methods used by participants to watch or reduce sodium intake were not assessed. Third, these results are not generalizable to the entire United States. Although CDC encouraged states to use the module to assess the sodium-related behavior, the reasons individual states chose to use the module is unknown. Finally, response bias is possible because BRFSS response rates were <50%. Despite these limitations, this report is the first to provide multistate data on sodium-reduction behavior among all BRFSS respondents.

        The data in this report highlight the opportunity to increase the proportion of health care professionals who advise their patients to reduce sodium intake and the proportion of U.S. adults who take action to reduce sodium intake. During 2011–2012, approximately 48% of hypertension among U.S. adults was uncontrolled (7). From 2010 to 2030, total direct medical costs of cardiovascular disease are projected to triple, increasing from $273 billion to $818 billion (in 2008 U.S. dollars) (8). Reducing sodium intake by 1,200 mg daily is projected to save $18 billion in health care costs yearly (9). Health care professionals can make a difference by recommending healthy dietary patterns, such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (10). By expanding the use of the sodium-related behavior module, states can enhance the ability to evaluate the effects of sodium-reduction campaigns.

        1Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

        Corresponding author: Jing Fang, jfang@cdc.gov, 770-488-0259.

        References

        1. Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu J, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2013. NCHS Data Brief, no. 178. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2014. Available at http://www.cy118119.com/nchs/data/databriefs/db178.htm.
        2. US Department of Agriculture. What we eat in America. NHANES 2011–2012, individuals 2 years and over (excluding breast-fed children), day 1. Available at http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/80400530/pdf/1112/Table_1_NIN_GEN_11.pdf.
        3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. Nutrition and weight status. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/nutrition-and-weight-status/objectives.
        4. CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 2013 summary data quality report, August 15, 2014. Available at http://www.cy118119.com/brfss/annual_data/2013/pdf/2013_DQR.pdf.
        5. CDC. Self-reported hypertension and use of antihypertensive medication among adults—United States, 2005–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62:237–44.
        6. CDC. BRFSS prevalence and trends data. Available at http://www.cy118119.com/brfss/brfssprevalence.
        7. Ritchey MD, Wall HK, Gillespie C, George MG, Jamal A. Million Hearts: prevalence of leading cardiovascular disease risk factors—United States, 2005–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63:462–7.
        8. Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:933–44.
        9. Bibbins-Domingo K, Chertow GM, Coxson PG, et al. Projected effect of dietary salt reductions on future cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2010;362:590–9.
        10. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med 2001;344:3–10.

        * South Census region includes Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia.

        Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2013/pr008-13.shtml.


        Summary

        What is already known on this topic?

        National surveillance data show that current sodium intake in the United States is substantially higher than recommended. Excess sodium intake is an important risk factor for hypertension.

        What is added by this report?

        In 2013, among 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, the median prevalence of taking action to reduce sodium intake was 51%, ranging from 39% to 73%. The median prevalence of receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake was 22%, ranging from 14% to 41%. Although action and advice were higher among hypertensive participants across locations, 20%–50% did not report taking action, and 38%–68% reported not receiving advice to reduce sodium intake.

        What are the implications for public health practice?

        These data highlight the opportunity to increase the proportion of health professionals who advise their patients to reduce sodium intake and the proportion of U.S. adults who take action to reduce sodium intake.


        TABLE 1. Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake, by hypertension status — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013

        State/Area

        Overall

        Self-reported hypertension

        No self-reported hypertension

        No.

        %

        (95% CI)

        No.

        %

        (95% CI)

        No.

        %

        (95% CI)

        Arkansas

        4,469

        52.6

        (50.3–54.9)

        2,231

        62.9

        (57.6–67.8)

        2,238

        47.1

        (44.4–49.8)

        Connecticut

        6,547

        50.7

        (48.8–52.6)

        2,589

        67.7

        (62.6–72.4)

        3,958

        44.0

        (41.9–46.2)

        DC

        3,990

        54.8

        (52.2–57.4)

        1,623

        70.8

        (63.7–77.0)

        2,367

        47.8

        (44.7–50.8)

        Hawaii

        6,992

        55.8

        (54.0–57.5)

        2,204

        63.2

        (57.9–68.2)

        4,788

        52.8

        (50.8–54.8)

        Indiana

        4,362

        45.2

        (43.3–47.3)

        1,904

        57.0

        (51.9–62.0)

        2,458

        39.8

        (37.5–42.1)

        Iowa

        7,210

        45.5

        (43.9–47.1)

        2,889

        57.7

        (53.1–62.2)

        4,321

        40.6

        (38.9–42.4)

        Kansas

        10,947

        43.3

        (42.1–44.4)

        4,455

        55.9

        (52.5–59.1)

        6,492

        37.7

        (36.4–39.1)

        Kentucky

        9,704

        50.5

        (48.9–52.1)

        4,717

        72.4

        (69.0–75.6)

        4,987

        39.2

        (37.2–41.1)

        Maine

        4,496

        52.3

        (50.3–54.4)

        1,807

        67.7

        (61.5–73.3)

        2,689

        47.6

        (45.2–49.9)

        Maryland

        11,473

        52.2

        (50.7–53.7)

        4,907

        63.7

        (60.1–67.2)

        6,566

        46.4

        (44.6–48.1)

        Massachusetts

        3,332

        49.8

        (46.5–53.2)

        1,343

        61.7

        (50.9–71.5)

        1,989

        45.4

        (41.7–49.1)

        Minnesota

        12,363

        40.7

        (39.2–42.3)

        4,256

        52.9

        (48.9–56.8)

        8,107

        35.2

        (33.3–37.1)

        Mississippi

        6,628

        56.3

        (54.4–58.1)

        3,514

        66.1

        (61.8–70.1)

        3,114

        48.6

        (46.2–50.9)

        Missouri

        5,478

        51.2

        (48.9–53.5)

        2,527

        58.6

        (53.3–63.6)

        2,951

        46.9

        (44.2–49.6)

        Montana

        4,517

        44.9

        (42.9–46.9)

        1,706

        55.3

        (50.0–60.6)

        2,811

        40.0

        (37.7–42.3)

        Nebraska

        7,667

        44.8

        (43.0–46.6)

        3,095

        56.2

        (51.4–61.0)

        4,572

        39.5

        (37.4–41.5)

        New Jersey

        3,700

        59.3

        (56.8–61.8)

        1,365

        71.9

        (63.6–79.0)

        2,335

        54.5

        (51.5–57.3)

        North Carolina

        3,824

        58.2

        (56.1–60.4)

        1,749

        70.8

        (65.2–75.8)

        2,075

        53.2

        (50.6–55.8)

        North Dakota

        6,932

        45.7

        (44.0–47.3)

        2,583

        60.7

        (55.2–65.9)

        4,349

        40.4

        (38.5–42.3)

        Ohio

        7,138

        46.0

        (44.3–47.7)

        3,078

        56.8

        (52.5–61.0)

        4,060

        40.0

        (38.0–42.1)

        Oklahoma

        3,846

        51.8

        (49.6–53.9)

        1,808

        59.8

        (54.4–65.0)

        2,038

        46.9

        (44.3–49.4)

        Tennessee

        4,771

        53.8

        (51.7–55.9)

        2,343

        63.3

        (56.9–69.3)

        2,428

        47.3

        (44.7–50.0)

        Utah

        5,997

        38.8

        (37.3–40.2)

        1,854

        49.6

        (45.3–54.0)

        4,143

        34.8

        (33.1–36.5)

        Virginia

        7,045

        55.2

        (53.6–56.8)

        2,859

        67.9

        (64.0–71.6)

        4,186

        49.1

        (47.2–51.0)

        Washington

        9,918

        49.0

        (47.6–50.4)

        3,888

        60.2

        (56.4–63.9)

        6,030

        42.6

        (42.0–45.2)

        West Virginia

        5,578

        43.4

        (41.8–45.1)

        2,619

        56.5

        (52.8–60.2)

        2,959

        35.9

        (34.0–37.9)

        Wisconsin

        5,360

        44.3

        (42.1–46.5)

        2,174

        60.1

        (54.0–65.9)

        3,186

        37.0

        (34.5–39.7)

        Puerto Rico

        5,783

        73.4

        (71.8–74.9)

        2,896

        80.0

        (76.6–83.0)

        2,887

        70.0

        (67.9–72.0)

        Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DC = District of Columbia.


        FIGURE 1. Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013

        The figure is a map showing the age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake in 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico during 2013.

        Alternate Text: The figure above is a map showing the age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake in 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico during 2013.


        TABLE 2. Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake, by hypertension status — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013

        State/Area

        Overall

        Self-reported hypertension

        No self-reported hypertension

        No.

        %

        (95% CI)

        No.

        %

        (95% CI)

        No.

        %

        (95% CI)

        Arkansas

        4,475

        22.6

        (20.8–24.4)

        2,225

        44.5

        (39.6–49.5)

        2,250

        10.7

        (9.1–12.6)

        Connecticut

        6,551

        21.7

        (20.2–23.2)

        2,586

        49.9

        (44.9–55.0)

        3,965

        10.9

        (9.5–12.5)

        DC

        3,996

        27.4

        (25.3–29.6)

        1,622

        60.7

        (53.8–67.2)

        2,374

        13.3

        (11.4–15.5)

        Hawaii

        6,977

        24.3

        (22.8–25.8)

        2,195

        49.1

        (44.6–53.7)

        4,782

        14.8

        (13.4–16.4)

        Indiana

        4,360

        20.5

        (19.1–22.0)

        1,898

        40.5

        (36.3–44.9)

        2,462

        9.8

        (8.5–11.3)

        Iowa

        7,186

        17.8

        (16.7–19.0)

        2,874

        40.4

        (36.2–44.7)

        4,312

        8.9

        (7.9–10.1)

        Kansas

        10,932

        17.0

        (16.2–17.8)

        4,428

        37.1

        (34.0–40.3)

        6,504

        7.9

        (7.2–8.7)

        Kentucky

        9,677

        28.2

        (26.9–29.5)

        4,689

        60.3

        (56.5–63.9)

        4,988

        10.1

        (9.0–11.3)

        Maine

        4,490

        19.3

        (17.8–20.8)

        1,794

        45.8

        (39.7–52.0)

        2,696

        9.1

        (7.9–10.6)

        Maryland

        11,489

        23.8

        (22.6–25.0)

        4,898

        48.5

        (44.7–52.4)

        6,591

        12.4

        (11.2–13.6)

        Massachusetts

        3,323

        18.1

        (16.1–20.3)

        1,336

        37.8

        (31.4–44.7)

        1,987

        9.2

        (7.4–11.5)

        Minnesota

        12,398

        13.5

        (12.4–14.6)

        4,249

        31.7

        (28.0–35.7)

        8,149

        7.0

        (6.0–8.2)

        Mississippi

        6,610

        27.0

        (25.5–28.5)

        3,503

        49.3

        (45.0–53.5)

        3,107

        12.6

        (11.1–14.2)

        Missouri

        5,457

        19.8

        (18.3–21.4)

        2,502

        45.0

        (39.2–51.0)

        2,955

        9.9

        (8.5–11.4)

        Montana

        4,508

        13.8

        (12.5–15.1)

        1,693

        33.3

        (28.1–38.8)

        2,815

        6.2

        (5.2–7.3)

        Nebraska

        7,660

        17.1

        (15.9–18.3)

        3,086

        35.1

        (31.0–39.5)

        4,574

        8.5

        (7.4–9.7)

        New Jersey

        3,715

        23.5

        (21.6–25.5)

        1,359

        50.5

        (42.8–58.2)

        2,356

        12.5

        (10.7–14.6)

        North Carolina

        3,808

        24.1

        (22.4–25.8)

        1,735

        47.1

        (41.9–52.4)

        2,073

        12.3

        (10.7–14.0)

        North Dakota

        6,941

        15.1

        (14.1–16.2)

        2,569

        36.6

        (31.9–41.5)

        4,372

        6.5

        (5.6–7.5)

        Ohio

        7,160

        20.2

        (18.9–21.5)

        3,076

        40.9

        (37.0–44.9)

        4,084

        9.8

        (8.6–11.2)

        Oklahoma

        3,835

        22.6

        (21.0–24.2)

        1,798

        40.3

        (35.4–45.4)

        2,037

        12.4

        (10.9–14.2)

        Tennessee

        4,756

        23.2

        (21.5–25.0)

        2,329

        41.9

        (37.9–46.0)

        2,427

        11.5

        (9.9–13.3)

        Utah

        5,988

        14.5

        (13.5–15.6)

        1,842

        35.5

        (31.3–39.8)

        4,146

        6.7

        (5.9–7.7)

        Virginia

        7,065

        22.6

        (21.4–23.9)

        2,857

        48.8

        (45.0–52.6)

        4,208

        10.1

        (9.0–11.2)

        Washington

        9,926

        17.7

        (16.7–18.7)

        3,871

        40.3

        (36.6–44.1)

        6,055

        8.3

        (7.4–9.2)

        West Virginia

        5,557

        22.4

        (21.1–23.6)

        2,597

        43.1

        (39.4–46.9)

        2,960

        9.8

        (8.7–11.0)

        Wisconsin

        5,350

        18.6

        (16.9–20.4)

        2,169

        41.4

        (35.6–47.3)

        3,181

        8.6

        (7.0–10.6)

        Puerto Rico

        5,781

        41.4

        (39.7–43.0)

        2,896

        61.6

        (57.9–65.1)

        2,885

        27.2

        (25.2–29.2)

        Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DC = District of Columbia.


        FIGURE 2. Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013

        The figure is a map showing age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake in 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico during 2013.

        Alternate Text: The figure above is a map showing age-adjusted percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake in 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico during 2013.



        Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

        References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.


        All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cy118119.com/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

        **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

         
        USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA
        800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
        A-Z Index
        1. A
        2. B
        3. C
        4. D
        5. E
        6. F
        7. G
        8. H
        9. I
        10. J
        11. K
        12. L
        13. M
        14. N
        15. O
        16. P
        17. Q
        18. R
        19. S
        20. T
        21. U
        22. V
        23. W
        24. X
        25. Y
        26. Z
        27. #
        国产精品久久久久久一级毛片