• <samp id="ossg8"></samp>
    <tbody id="ossg8"><nobr id="ossg8"></nobr></tbody>
    <menuitem id="ossg8"><strong id="ossg8"></strong></menuitem>
  • <samp id="ossg8"></samp>
    <menuitem id="ossg8"><strong id="ossg8"></strong></menuitem>
  • <menuitem id="ossg8"><ins id="ossg8"></ins></menuitem>

  • <tbody id="ossg8"><nobr id="ossg8"></nobr></tbody>
    <menuitem id="ossg8"></menuitem>
        Skip Navigation LinksSkip Navigation Links
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Safer Healthier People
        Blue White
        Blue White
        bottom curve
        CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z spacer spacer
        spacer
        Blue curve MMWR spacer
        spacer
        spacer


        Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail.

        Obesity Prevalence Among Low-Income, Preschool-Aged Children --- United States, 1998--2008

        Childhood obesity continues to be a leading public health concern that disproportionately affects low-income and minority children (1). Children who are obese in their preschool years are more likely to be obese in adolescence and adulthood (2) and to develop diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, asthma, and sleep apnea (3). One of the Healthy People 2010 objectives (19-3) is to reduce to 5% the proportion of children and adolescents who are obese (4). CDC's Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System (PedNSS) is the only source of nationally compiled obesity surveillance data obtained at the state and local level for low-income, preschool-aged children participating in federally funded health and nutrition programs. To describe progress in reducing childhood obesity, CDC examined trends and current prevalence in obesity using PedNSS data submitted by participating states, territories, and Indian tribal organizations during 1998--2008. The findings indicated that obesity prevalence among low-income, preschool-aged children increased steadily from 12.4% in 1998 to 14.5% in 2003, but subsequently remained essentially the same, with a 14.6% prevalence in 2008. Reducing childhood obesity will require effective prevention strategies that focus on environments and policies promoting physical activity and a healthy diet for families, child care centers, and communities.

        PedNSS is a state-based surveillance system that monitors the nutritional status of children from birth through age 4 years enrolled in federally funded programs that serve low-income children. For all states except California and North Carolina, data come exclusively from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).* In California, data are exclusively from Medicaid-funded programs. North Carolina submits data from both WIC (95.5%) and non-WIC programs (4.5%).? For the states included in this analysis, 21.0% of children aged 2--4 years are covered by PedNSS. On average, children are seen twice a year by the program; height and weight are measured each time. Data are collected at the clinic level and submitted to CDC for analysis. Federally funded programs submit data on weight, height (measured by trained staff using a standard protocol during clinic visits), age, sex, and the race/ethnicity reported by the child's parent or caregiver. CDC uses weight, height, and age data to calculate body mass index (BMI) (weight [kg] / height [m2]). For children aged 2--4 years, obesity is defined as BMI-for-age ≥95th percentile based on the 2000 CDC sex-specific growth charts (5). CDC performs routine edits to assess data quality. An error flag is applied to height or weight data that are either missing, miscoded, or biologically implausible (e.g., height-for-age z-score <-5.0 or >3.0, body mass index [BMI]-for-age [children aged ≥2 years] z-score <-4.0 or >5.0, weight-for-age z-score <-4.0 or >5.0, or BMI-for-age [children aged ≥2 years] z-score <-4.0 or >5.0). All flagged data are excluded from PedNSS analyses.

        CDC randomly selected one record per child per year to estimate obesity prevalence in 1998, 2003, and 2008. To assess the change in obesity prevalence in PedNSS overall and by race/ethnicity, prevalence was estimated using data only from the subset of federally funded programs that participated in 1998, 2003, and 2008 (N = 37). The average annual change in obesity prevalence during 1998--2003 and 2003--2008 was estimated for each PedNSS program. If data for a program were unavailable for a given year but were available for the preceding or subsequent year, CDC substituted the data for the adjacent year and calculated the annual change to account for the shorter or longer period. Chi-square tests for difference in proportions were conducted across each period, and tests were statistically significant (p<0.05) unless otherwise noted in this report.

        During 1998--2008, the number of federally funded programs reporting data to PedNSS varied from 43 to 52. In 2008, records on approximately 8 million children were submitted from 43 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and six Indian tribal organizations (Table). The overall prevalence of obesity among low-income, preschool-aged children increased from 12.4% (n = 1,999,970) in 1998 to 14.5% (n = 1,967,625) in 2003 and 14.6% (n = 2,222,410) in 2008 (Figure). Obesity prevalence increased 0.43 percentage points annually during 1998--2003, but only 0.02 percentage points annually during 2003--2008. Obesity increased across all racial/ethnic groups during 1998--2003, with the exception of Asian/Pacific Islander (A/PI) children. However, during 2003--2008, obesity remained stable among all groups except American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) children. In 2008, prevalence was highest among AI/AN (21.2%) and Hispanic (18.5%) children, and lowest among non-Hispanic white (12.6%), non-Hispanic black (11.8%), and A/PI (12.3%) children.

        In 2008, only programs in Colorado and Hawaii had obesity prevalences ≤10%. The two federally funded programs with prevalence >20% were Indian tribal organizations (Table). Of the 41 PedNSS programs supplying data for 1998--2003, a total of 38 (93%) reported an increase in obesity prevalence. In contrast, of the 44 programs supplying data for 2003--2008, 22 (50%) reported an increase in obesity, whereas 14 (32%) reported no change, and eight (18%) reported a decrease.

        Reported by: AJ Sharma, PhD, LM Grummer-Strawn, PhD, K Dalenius, MPH, D Galuska, PhD, M Anandappa, MS, E Borland, H Mackintosh, MSPH, R Smith, MS, Div of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

        Editorial Note:

        Reduction of obesity among children and adolescents is a national priority in the United States (4). The results presented in this report indicate that among low-income, preschool-aged children participating in federally funded nutrition programs, the prevalence of obesity increased during 1998--2003, but stabilized during 2003--2008. In 2008, the national prevalence of obesity in this group remained highest among low-income Hispanic and AI/AN children and continued to increase among AI/AN children. These results suggest overall progress in stabilizing the prevalence of childhood obesity in a subset of low-income, preschool-aged children. However, these results should be confirmed through additional research using other data sets.

        Children in preschool age groups are a priority for surveillance because obesity trends in this group can serve as a bellwether for trends in older children and adults (2). PedNSS currently serves as the only source of national obesity prevalence data compiled specifically on low-income, preschool-aged children. Because PedNSS nutritional data are dependent on enrollments in participating federally funded programs, PedNSS results are subject to variations in enrollment in these programs in each state. However, the effect of such variations on PedNSS results is difficult to determine. Conditions within a state that differentially affect the enrollment of children with varying prevalences of obesity could affect state or national results. In addition, changes in the proportion of children from each state might alter the results. For example, California, the largest data contributor to PedNSS, has one of the highest prevalences of obesity. The percentage of the total PedNSS sample provided by California decreased from 20.2% in 1998 to 13.6% in 2008. However, even deletion of all California data would not alter the overall results; an increase from 1998 to 2003 would still be observed, followed by stabilization through 2008. Furthermore, stabilization or declines were observed in half of the individual federally funded programs in PedNSS.

        To maintain the consistency of PedNSS data, methods for data collection and recording are set nationally and are uniform across states and participating federal programs. The procedures for collecting height and weight data did not change during 1998--2008, with the exception of an increasing use of digital scales. Given the procedures within the WIC program for regular calibration of scales, this change should not affect rates of obesity. CDC has stringent requirements for data quality and uses standardized procedures for data cleaning; data files that do not meet these standards are rejected, as are records that do not meet standards for acceptable heights and weights.

        The reason for the stabilization of overall obesity prevalence among these children during 2003--2008 is not known and likely is complex. One factor might be prevention efforts within state and local WIC programs targeting behaviors related to obesity in children. For example, certain initiatives in WIC§ have attempted to raise public awareness, acceptance, and support of breastfeeding, increased the percentage of low-fat or fat-free milk vouchers issued for children aged >2 years,? and reduced television viewing (6). Recommendations such as those from the Institute of Medicine's Preventing Childhood Obesity report also might have spurred greater attention to obesity prevention for all children (7).

        The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) also has found a stabilization of obesity prevalence in U.S. children. NHANES found no significant increase in obesity prevalence during 1999--2006 in children aged 2--19 years (8). This apparent plateau remained even after adjusting for differences in prevalence by age group. Trends in the 2--5 year age group were not analyzed separately because of small sample size. For NHANES 2003--2006, the overall prevalence of obesity (BMI-for-age ≥95th percentile) for children aged 2--5 years was 12.4% (standard error = 1.0%), lower than the rates for both 2003 and 2008 described in this report.

        The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, the proportion of children participating in federally funded nutrition programs increased during 1998--2008, as evidenced by the 11% increase in the number of children in these analyses (i.e., from 1,999,970 in 1998 to 2,222,410 in 2008). However, how the addition of these children might have affected the prevalence of obesity is unknown. Second, the percentage of the total PedNSS dataset that is made up of WIC records increased from 76% in 1998 to 85% in 2008. If the prevalence of obesity were lower in WIC than in non-WIC programs, this increase could partially explain the observed trends. However, when the analysis was conducted using only data from WIC, results were not substantially different. Finally, PedNSS data are not representative of all low-income, preschool-aged children in the United States because not all states participate in PedNSS and not all low-income children participate in federally funded programs.

        Childhood obesity remains a serious public health problem even among this subset, particularly among AI/AN children. A sustained and effective public health response is necessary across the United States to reduce childhood obesity. Strategies should emphasize improving environments and policies that promote physical activity and a healthy diet.

        References

        1. Wang Y, Beydoun MA. The obesity epidemic in the United States---gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiol Rev 2007;29:6--28.
        2. Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T. Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med 1993;22:167--77.
        3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement: prevention of pediatric overweight and obesity. Pediatrics 2003;112:424--30.
        4. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: objectives for improving health (part B: focus areas 15--28). 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. Available at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
        5. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, et al. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data 2000;314:1--27. Available at http://www.cy118119.com/growthcharts.
        6. Johnson DB, Birkett D, Evens C, Pickering S. Statewide intervention to reduce television viewing in WIC clients and staff. Am J Health Promot 2005;19:418--21.
        7. Institute of Medicine. Preventing childhood obesity: health in the balance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
        8. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003--2006. JAMA 2008;299:2401--5.

        * Eligibility criteria for WIC includes a family income ≤185% of the poverty income threshold, based on U.S. Poverty Income Guidelines, available at http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/poverty. A person who participates or has family members who participate in certain other benefit programs, such as the Medicaid or Aid to Families with Dependent Children/Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, automatically meets the income-eligibility requirement.

        ? Including the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program, other Medicaid-funded child health programs, and Title V Maternal and Child Health Programs. Eligibility criteria includes a family income ≤200% of the poverty income threshold, based on U.S. Poverty Income Guidelines. The non-WIC records accounted for 24% of records in 1998, 19% in 2003, and 15% in 2008.

        § Additional information available at http://www.nal.usda.gov/wicworks/spotlight/bfweek_resources.html.

        ? Additional information available at http://www.health.state.ny.us/prevention/nutrition/resources/docs/2003-2006_ewph_community_intervention_projects.pdf.

        TABLE. Average annual change in obesity* prevalence among children aged 2--4 years, by state, territory, and Indian tribal organization? --- Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System, United States, 1998--2003 and 2003--2008

        State, territory, or Indian tribal organization

        Average percentage-point change per year

        1998

        2003

        2008

        No. of

        children

        Obesity

        prevalence (%)

        No. of

        children

        Obesity

        prevalence (%)

        No. of

        children

        Obesity

        prevalence (%)

        1998--2003

        2003--2008

        Alabama

        39,998

        11.7

        30,221

        14.7?

        56,813

        13.8

        0.50

        -0.23

        Arizona

        51,279

        9.7

        67,618

        12.4?

        75,338

        14.6

        0.45

        0.55

        Arkansas

        34,968

        9.7

        31,625

        12.2

        38,591

        13.9

        0.50

        0.34

        California

        398,222

        15.5

        344,384

        17.6

        301,643

        17.3

        0.42

        -0.06

        Colorado

        ---§

        ---

        50,773

        9.4

        43,476

        9.4

        ---

        0.00**

        Connecticut

        23,272

        17.8

        22,495

        19.6

        25,623

        15.5

        0.36

        -0.82

        Florida

        141,831

        11.3

        155,482

        13.4

        209,671

        14.1

        0.42

        0.14

        Georgia

        87,823

        9.4

        92,728

        12.4

        124,533

        14.8

        0.60

        0.48

        Hawaii

        3,649

        10.3

        15,602

        10.1

        16,106

        9.3

        -0.04**

        -0.16

        Idaho

        15,121

        9.8

        16,340

        11.2

        20,081

        12.3

        0.28

        0.22

        Illinois

        88,178

        13.5

        70,666

        13.9

        63,414

        14.7

        0.08

        0.16

        Indiana

        64,411

        10.5

        51,953

        13.7

        66,499

        14.5

        0.64

        0.16

        Iowa

        29,788

        10.6

        32,913

        13.9

        33,548

        15.1

        0.66

        0.24

        Kansas

        22,628

        8.8

        27,076

        12.6

        34,352

        13.3

        0.76

        0.14

        Kentucky

        48,075

        12.1

        60,984

        17.2

        62,832

        15.7

        1.02

        -0.30

        Louisiana

        45,834

        10.4

        44,036

        13.3

        34,041

        13.8?

        0.58

        0.13

        Maine

        11,747

        12.1

        9,861

        15.8

        ---

        ---

        0.74

        ---

        Maryland

        23,329

        12.0

        42,884

        14.4?

        54,866

        15.7

        0.40

        0.33

        Massachusetts

        59,511

        14.8

        55,785

        16.7

        59,297

        16.7

        0.38

        0.00**

        Michigan

        90,760

        10.1

        93,962

        12.9

        103,523

        13.9

        0.56

        0.20

        Minnesota

        76,271

        11.0

        40,161

        13.2

        65,607

        13.4

        0.44

        0.04**

        Mississippi

        11,850

        13.2

        ---

        ---

        44,807

        14.6

        ---

        ---

        Missouri

        58,000

        9.8

        56,346

        13.3

        60,908

        13.9

        0.70

        0.12

        Montana

        9,658

        9.0

        10,178

        11.0

        10,428

        12.4

        0.40

        0.28

        Nebraska

        13,961

        9.9

        17,242

        13.4

        20,658

        13.9

        0.70

        0.10**

        Nevada

        6,123

        11.6

        14,595

        13.6

        23,348

        12.9

        0.40

        -0.14

        New Hampshire

        5,530

        13.5

        7,227

        15.6

        8,082

        15.5

        0.42

        -0.02**

        New Jersey

        56,292

        15.1

        56,774

        17.9

        68,163

        17.9

        0.56

        0.00**

        New Mexico

        17,523

        7.6

        27,555

        9.7

        22,295

        12.0

        0.42

        0.46

        New York

        207,479

        14.7

        186,284

        16.6

        209,713

        14.6

        0.38

        -0.40

        North Carolina

        80,956

        11.1

        75,206

        14.5

        96,381

        15.7

        0.68

        0.24

        North Dakota

        7,246

        9.4

        6,097

        11.6

        6,551

        13.8

        0.44

        0.44

        Ohio

        17,219

        10.4

        89,824

        11.6

        125,011

        12.2

        0.24

        0.12

        Oregon

        34,546

        11.9

        29,875

        14.7

        49,193

        14.7

        0.56

        0.00**

        Pennsylvania

        108,858

        10.7

        100,053

        12.4

        111,879

        11.5

        0.34

        -0.18

        Rhode Island

        ---

        ---

        ---

        ---

        11,466

        16.2

        ---

        ---

        South Carolina

        48,543

        10.0

        32,239

        12.4

        28,209

        13.3

        0.48

        0.18

        South Dakota

        8,968

        9.0

        8,423

        13.6

        9,125

        16.2

        0.92

        0.52

        Tennessee

        56,208

        10.0

        60,086

        12.0

        49,016

        13.8

        0.40

        0.36

        Texas

        ---

        ---

        422,127

        14.4

        164,435

        16.2

        ---

        0.36

        Utah

        23,765

        6.5

        31,099

        8.6

        ---

        ---

        0.42

        ---

        Vermont

        6,225

        11.6

        8,504

        13.1

        7,009

        13.3

        0.30

        0.04**

        Virginia

        ---

        ---

        20,238

        18.5

        59,627

        19.0

        ---

        0.10**

        Washington

        55,162

        12.0

        65,828

        13.8?

        92,980

        14.4

        0.45

        0.10

        West Virginia

        24,170

        10.6

        22,079

        13.2

        22,689

        13.5

        0.52

        0.06**

        Wisconsin

        52,186

        10.1

        50,284

        13.0

        55,875

        13.6

        0.58

        0.12

        Wyoming

        ---

        ---

        5,269

        9.5

        ---

        ---

        ---

        ---

        District of Columbia

        6,499

        10.9

        5,926

        13.3

        6,195

        13.3

        0.48

        0.00**

        Puerto Rico

        ---

        ---

        102,624

        24.0

        99,829

        17.9

        ---

        -1.22

        U.S. Virgin Islands

        ---

        ---

        ---

        ---

        2,339

        13.6

        ---

        ---

        Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe (SD)

        362

        22.1?

        388

        17.5

        423

        18.4

        -1.15**

        0.18**

        Chickasaw Nation (OK)

        1,039

        8.9

        1,478

        12.0

        ---

        ---

        0.62

        ---

        Inter Tribal Council of Arizona

        4,680

        19.8

        5,037

        20.9

        5,823

        23.5

        0.22**

        0.52

        Navajo Nation

        ---

        ---

        7,616

        14.4

        6,824

        16.9

        ---

        0.50

        Rosebud Sioux Tribe (SD)

        604

        16.4

        641

        17.3

        651

        19.2

        0.18**

        0.38**

        Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (ND)

        ---

        ---

        422

        20.1

        541

        25.0

        ---

        0.98**

        Three Affiliated Tribes (ND)

        ---

        ---

        ---

        ---

        163

        19.6

        ---

        ---

        * Defined as body mass index (BMI)-for-age ≥95th percentile based on the 2000 CDC sex-specific growth charts, available at http://www.cy118119.com/growthcharts.

        ? Data from subsequent year used.

        § Data not available.

        ? Data from preceding year used.

        ** No significant change in obesity prevalence.

        FIGURE. Change in obesity* prevalence during 1998--2003 and 2003--2008 among children aged 2--4 years, by race/ethnicity --- Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System, United States, 1998--2008?

        The figure shows changes in obesity prevalence from the period 1998-2003 to the period 2003-2008 among U.S. children aged 2-4 years, by race/ethnicity, based on date from the Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System. Overall, obesity prevalence among these low-income, preschool-aged children enrolled in federally funded nutrition programs increased steadily from 12.4% in 1998 to 14.5% in 2003, but subsequently remained essentially the same, with a 14.6% prevalence in 2008. Obesity increased across all racial/ethnic groups during 1998-2003, with the exception of Asian/Pacific Islander children. However, during 2003-2008, obesity remained stable among all groups except American Indian/Alaska Native children. In 2008, prevalence was highest among American Indian/Alaska Native (21.2%) and Hispanic (18.5%) children, and lowest among non-Hispanic white (12.6%), non-Hispanic black (11.8%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (12.3%) children.

        * Defined as body mass index (BMI)-for-age ≥95th percentile based on the 2000 CDC sex-specific growth charts, available at http://www.cy118119.com/growthcharts.

        ? Includes only the 37 federally funded programs that provided data in 1998, 2003, and 2008.

        § Sample sizes in 2008 were as follows: total, 2,222,410; non-Hispanic white, 845,910; non-Hispanic black, 438,645; Hispanic, 749,109; American Indian/Alaska Native, 23,960; and Asian/Pacific Islander, 68,933.

        Alternative Text: The figure above shows changes in obesity prevalence from the period 1998-2003 to the period 2003-2008 among U.S. children aged 2-4 years, by race/ethnicity, based on date from the Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System. Overall, obesity prevalence among these low-income, preschool-aged children enrolled in federally funded nutrition programs increased steadily from 12.4% in 1998 to 14.5% in 2003, but subsequently remained essentially the same, with a 14.6% prevalence in 2008. Obesity increased across all racial/ethnic groups during 1998-2003, with the exception of Asian/Pacific Islander children. However, during 2003-2008, obesity remained stable among all groups except American Indian/Alaska Native children. In 2008, prevalence was highest among American Indian/Alaska Native (21.2%) and Hispanic (18.5%) children, and lowest among non-Hispanic white (12.6%), non-Hispanic black (11.8%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (12.3%) children.

        Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.


        References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

        All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cy118119.com/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

        **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

        Date last reviewed: 7/23/2009

        HOME  |  ABOUT MMWR  |  MMWR SEARCH  |  DOWNLOADS  |  RSSCONTACT
        POLICY  |  DISCLAIMER  |  ACCESSIBILITY

        Safer, Healthier People

        Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        1600 Clifton Rd, MailStop E-90, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A

        USA.GovDHHS

        Department of Health
        and Human Services




        国产精品久久久久久一级毛片